The Way Undercover Filming Uncovered a £28m Holiday Ownership Scam

Authorities have called it as one of the largest scams of its kind in the United Kingdom.

In all 14 individuals have been convicted for their part in a £28m plot to defraud in excess of 3,500 holiday ownership holders.

The targets were keen to get out of decades-old holiday ownership agreements and went looking for support.

The majority were aged between 60 and 80. Over 500 of them surrendered in excess of £10,000, and one handed over more than £80,000.

Those targeted were faced high-pressure consultations extending for six hours. They were out of money, owning worthless fake "points" and continued to be locked into high-priced vacation property deals they often use.

The Business At the Heart of the Scam

The firm at the centre of the fraud was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They took clients' cash to fund the proprietors' opulent way of life of prestigious schooling, high-end properties and exclusive air travel.

The leader at the head of the company, Mark Rowe, was handed a seven and a half year jail time in January for deceptive scheme.

Recently, his spouse one of the co-defendants was one of the final three to receive sentencing.

She was given a 24-month suspended prison term at Southwark Crown Court after pleading guilty to illegal fund handling.

The outcome represents a long time coming and marks a significant success for the individuals who testified, the authorities and the Crown.

The Way the Inquiry Started

I first heard about the company came in the summer of 2016. I was working in the research department of a broadcasting service, producing current affairs shows.

A friend noted that his parent had taken over the rights of a vacation unit in the Spanish coast and, after decades of vacations, had begun looking to exit the contract.

It should be noted how popular timeshares had become with English tourists in the eighties and nineties.

Holiday ownership permitted people to occupy the equivalent unit every year, or trade their time slots with other owners who had apartments in different locations. Approximately 600,000 sun-lovers seized that option.

The early surge was linked to a many reports about dishonest operators fraudulently marketing properties. They appeared frequently on investigative broadcasts.

The standard timeshare contract tied investors in for many years.

At that time, those owners who had experienced their assigned property in the resort for 20 or 30 years were ageing, and a large proportion were attempting to say farewell to their timeshares.

Several had health issues and were unable to visit their properties. Some just felt they'd achieved their goals from them. And others had died, in many cases leaving their family members to take over the agreements - plus their regular contributions and service charges.

The Covert Probe Develops

It was at this point the family member had ended up. She searched the web for solutions and found SMT, a business whose website assured to release her from her deal.

However, having paid a fee and booked a meeting with them, her loved ones became suspicious.

Subsequent checking revealed many victims reporting they had submitted funds and got nothing from the service. Indeed, they had suffered financially. Significant sums.

The reporting group started looking into what was occurring. It soon emerged that there were dubious individuals operating in the timeshare resale sector.

A legal professional had hundreds of individual complaints aiming to litigate against the company.

We spoke to individuals who had used the firm and they all told the same story. They thought the business would acquire their investment away from them but when they went to a consultation (for which they made an advance payment) they were told there was no re-sale value.

Rather, they were persuaded - actually compelled - to commit further cash acquiring "the company's points system", linked to the business's umbrella group, the parent organization.

The nature of these rewards was somewhat vague. They seemed similar to a form of credit, providing reduced-price holidays and amenities and consumer discounts.

And they were reportedly "exchangeable with additional holders, at a future date.

Investing money at the time would result in an long-term benefit that would pay for the firm's costs and allow the property owner in profit, released finally from their troublesome deal.

An unbelievable offer? Certainly, that proved correct.

A 'Misleading Scheme'

Assuming these reports were true, this was a massive scam.

It's what is called a "deceptive marketing."

An operator - here the company - "baits" the client by promoting a specific service but then to say that's not available, steering the customer to a different, lower-quality option.

Such practices are unlawful. Armed with all the evidence we had assembled, we made the case to secretly film one of the organization's sessions.

The process requires time, effort, and compelling reasons for why this is the exclusive approach to collect the evidence needed to confirm deceptive practices.

Armed with that permission, our limited crew set up a appointment with one of the organization's staff in the location.

Posing as a potential client aiming to get his mum out of her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement

Louis Garcia
Louis Garcia

A passionate web developer and designer with over a decade of experience in creating user-friendly and innovative digital solutions.