🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.