🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an international accord designed to protect females from abuse, covering domestic abuse, following extensive and heated debates in the legislature.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in Riga this past week to oppose the decision. The final decision now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to approve or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to develop laws and support services to eliminate all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the initial EU country to initiate the process of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a significant regression for women's rights.

Ideological Debate and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its emphasis on equal rights weakens family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move proposed by opposition parties but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for centre-right Prime Minister the nation's PM, who joined protesters outside the legislature earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that violence does not triumph," she stated to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary parties supporting the exit is Latvia First, whose head has urged citizens to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The Thursday's vote has provoked widespread outcry both within Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a national appeal demanding the convention to be maintained. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a protest for next Thursday, charging lawmakers of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Possible Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a rash choice driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey left the convention four years ago, cases of femicide and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the head of state could possibly send back the bill for additional review if he holds concerns.

Head of State the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to legal requirements, "taking into account state and legal considerations, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, indicated it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in Latvia but across the continent," commented a rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been rising in multiple EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's vote could influence comparable debates in additional member states